aesc: (Default)
aesc ([personal profile] aesc) wrote2007-06-08 06:43 pm

FSA (Fanperson Service Announcement)

Good people--

If you have SciFi or its equivalent, contrive some way of putting SGA on your TV tonight (9PM EST), if you can, even if you don't watch it. It'd be really cool of you.

Thanks!

[ETA: I amend my statement to, "Even if you don't have a Nielsen box, it's "Submersion" this week, which is nice. So watch if you like."]

(Also, as an aside to the SciFi people: See, this is why putting a show on hiatus for six months [or whatever] is not a good thing. You've sorely, sorely overestimated the average person's [read: non-fanperson's] ability to remember a once-a-week one-hour programming block by about five months and twenty-two days.

And if you want ratings to stay up, or at least not go any lower, don't do it again, as people don't like it when you jerk them around.

I'm just sayin'.)


In other news: Is there any? If there is, let me know.

[identity profile] lilithilien.livejournal.com 2007-06-08 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I've been seeing this plea to watch SGA pop up everywhere on my flist today, sparked by Mallozzi's blog about poor ratings for the show. What he failed to mention is that it doesn't matter one whit whether we devour every minute of the show -- and leaving it on in another room if you're not watching is just wasting energy. What matters is that the 5000 people that Neilsen has chosen as representative of the entire viewing audience watch it. Those 5000 folks click their control when they're paying attention and click it off when they're not, and the advertisers drool at their opinions. What we watch? Useless.

Yeah, it's a piss-poor system, but that's how TV ratings work.

[identity profile] aesc.livejournal.com 2007-06-08 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Still, people should watch it. It's "Submersion" this week :)

You have to wonder about how channels like SciFi, which cater to a targeted interest, manage to stay afloat given that few of that demographic are likely to be among the 5,000 Neilsen viewers (I'm assuming that the viewers are roughly representative of the American population--and I'm sure that it's skewed in some way; I don't know how Neilsen does its sampling). Maybe geeks are doing well enough money-wise to keep SciFi and its advertisers happy (or were doing well enough), I don't know.

Also, it's clearly time that I be put in charge of the world because the piss-poorness of it all is starting to become deeply aggravating to me.

[identity profile] lilithilien.livejournal.com 2007-06-08 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Nielsen's actually an amazing creature ... if you think statistical analysis is amazing, that is. I did some research on them in a Democracy and Media class I took in grad school. They do claim to be fully representative, and their screening process is very selective. You can bet there are a fair number of geeks represented.

Now, can one viewer actually speak for 60,407 people (based on the US population of 302,038,596)? They claim it works. I'm skeptical.

SG-1 getting canned didn't bode well for Atlantis, though. You figure that the person/people who liked SG-1 probably were also fans of Atlantis (although that's not a sure thing). And if their attention wandered away from the first Stargate show, you have to wonder whether they came back for the second hour.

I am all for you being put in charge of the world. I think you'd do a fine job.

[identity profile] aesc.livejournal.com 2007-06-08 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Nielsen's actually an amazing creature ... if you think statistical analysis is amazing, that is.

Amazing enough that I went into literature instead of psychology :D my statistical methods class still gives me nightmares.

And that "Democracy and Media" class sounds deeply intriguing. I hope it was as interesting and cool as it sounds.

[identity profile] dogeared.livejournal.com 2007-06-08 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Wet Joooooooooooooe. *sigh*

[identity profile] aesc.livejournal.com 2007-06-08 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly my point :D

[identity profile] dogeared.livejournal.com 2007-06-08 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
*prepares to watch his hair sproing magically back into place*

[identity profile] aesc.livejournal.com 2007-06-08 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
*prepares to watch his hair sproing magically back into place*

I have access to a very nice speaker system tonight, so I'm going to listen to see if I can hear the sproing.

[identity profile] dogeared.livejournal.com 2007-06-08 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Hahahahahaha!! It's like that Joe interview where he talks about the headmaster smoothing his hair down . . . and then the *plink* *plink* *plink plink* as it sprang back up again. :D

[identity profile] aesc.livejournal.com 2007-06-09 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
and then the *plink* *plink* *plink plink* as it sprang back up again.

Hee! As a girl I had woefully uncooperative hair (not as cute as JF's), and the Chief Old Bat at my middle school was always on me to look pressed and proper so she'd make me tie it back in a ponytail. Not even ten minutes later my ponytail would be askew and half out of the rubber band.

And also BLACK RIMMED GLASSES OH MY GOD.

[identity profile] foxxcub.livejournal.com 2007-06-09 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
Rodney's hair was all fluffy at the beginning! /shallow review of ep

[identity profile] aesc.livejournal.com 2007-06-09 11:55 am (UTC)(link)
Hee! I just love the two of them.

John: You mean we.
Rodney: Yes. We.

*hearts*

[identity profile] foxxcub.livejournal.com 2007-06-09 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I know! Rodney braved claustrophobia and certain freak out for his man. ♥